Marie Romero

Marie Romero is a Counsel of the Dispute Resolution practice at Luther’s Luxembourg office.

Marie focuses on advising local and international clients on civil, commercial, and administrative litigation cases.  She has also gained experience in arbitration, tax disputes, and real estate and construction law.

Dispute Resolution
Complex Disputes

Marie Romero obtained a Master’s Degree in Private Law from the University of Nancy II, France. She was admitted to the Luxembourg Bar in 2002. Prior to joining Luther, she worked as dispute resolution lawyer for an independent business law firm in Luxembourg. She also worked as an external consultant for CNPD (Commission national pour la protection des données), the National Commission for Data Protection.

• Legal 500 EMEA (2021): Recognized for Dispute Resolution: ‘Marie Romero is an experienced lawyer who masters the proceedings and keeps her client informed in due course at every step.’ ‘Marie Romero does not miss any details and identifies the key arguments very quickly.’

• 23.10.2023: Litigation and Enforcement in Luxembourg: Overview
• 02.05.2023: Court of Appeal clarifies scope of promisor's obligations in surety bond
• 12.04.2022: Breach of condition precedent clauses and need to precisely draft termination and penalty clauses
• 30.06.2021: Securing company claims using directors' private assets: what kind of guarantee is used?
• 01.01.2021: Litigation and enforcement in Luxembourg: overview
• 04.08.2020: Unforeseeability theory developments in aftermath of COVID-19 crisis
• 05.05.2020: Impact of COVID-19 on contractual obligations: force majeure and case law
• 10.03.2020: District court rules on interpretation of minority actions
• 17.12.2019: Luxembourg District Court rules on prescription periods for invalidating shareholder decisions
• 31.10.2019: Directors' liability in event of non-compliance with company tax obligations: case law reversal
• 31.10.2019: Liquidator held liable for omitting claims arising from ongoing litigation
• 29.10.2019: District court examines aspects relating to loan guarantees